Do you use an economic intensity metric to demonstrate carbon improvements?
- sandla6
- Mar 12
- 1 min read

One effective way to show improvement, even when absolute emissions increase, is by using an ๐ฒ๐ฐ๐ผ๐ป๐ผ๐บ๐ถ๐ฐ ๐ถ๐ป๐๐ฒ๐ป๐๐ถ๐๐ ๐บ๐ฒ๐๐ฟ๐ถ๐ฐโsuch as COโ emissions per unit of revenue (see simple example in the image attached).
This approach highlights efficiency gains and provides meaningful insights into sustainability progress.
Hereโs why itโs useful:
โ ๐๐ฐ๐ฐ๐ผ๐๐ป๐๐ ๐ณ๐ผ๐ฟ ๐๐๐๐ถ๐ป๐ฒ๐๐ ๐๐ฟ๐ผ๐๐๐ต โ If a company expands operations while improving efficiency, absolute emissions might rise, but emissions per pound of revenue can decrease, showing sustainability improvements alongside growth.
โ ๐ฅ๐ฒ๐ณ๐น๐ฒ๐ฐ๐๐ ๐๐ณ๐ณ๐ถ๐ฐ๐ถ๐ฒ๐ป๐ฐ๐ ๐๐ฎ๐ถ๐ป๐ โ A business investing in energy-efficient technologies may not see an immediate drop in total emissions, but a lower emissions intensity per pound earned demonstrates progress.
โ ๐๐ป๐ฎ๐ฏ๐น๐ฒ๐ ๐๐ป๐ฑ๐๐๐๐ฟ๐ ๐๐ผ๐บ๐ฝ๐ฎ๐ฟ๐ถ๐๐ผ๐ป๐ โ Different sectors have varying emissions profiles. Measuring intensity allows businesses to benchmark sustainability efforts against industry peers more effectively.
While absolute emissions remain a critical metric, economic intensity provides additional context, especially for growing businesses. By tracking and communicating efficiency improvements, companies can showcase their sustainability progress while scaling operations.
























Comments